Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 28 octobre au 3 novembre
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 28 octobre au 3 novembre
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Christine Imms |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Interrater reliability and clinical utility of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting / Camilla RADIA-GEORGE in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 68/3 (mai-juin 2014)
[article]
Titre : Interrater reliability and clinical utility of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Camilla RADIA-GEORGE ; Christine Imms ; Nicholas F. Taylor Année de publication : 2014 Article en page(s) : 334-343 Langues : Anglais (eng) Résumé : OBJECTIVE:
We examined the interrater reliability and clinical utility of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) in a rehabilitation setting.
METHOD:
Ninety-six patients were recruited from the caseload of four occupational therapists. Patients were assessed on admission. Clinical utility was based on time to complete assessments.
RESULTS:
Interrater reliability for the total score was very high (intraclass correlation coefficient = .91). Limits of agreement for the program indicated aggregate data from individual scores were within 1.3 units (range = -1.3 to 0.5) but individual scores would be within 10 units (range = -9.3 to 0.2). The PC-PART took 27 min to complete.
CONCLUSION:
The PC-PART may have sufficient interrater reliability and clinical utility to evaluate program outcomes. The limits of agreement for rating individuals were relatively large, suggesting that it may be difficult to use the PC-PART to make clinical inferences about an individual patient.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=33761
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/3 (mai-juin 2014) . - 334-343[article] Interrater reliability and clinical utility of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) in an inpatient rehabilitation setting [texte imprimé] / Camilla RADIA-GEORGE ; Christine Imms ; Nicholas F. Taylor . - 2014 . - 334-343.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 68/3 (mai-juin 2014) . - 334-343
Résumé : OBJECTIVE:
We examined the interrater reliability and clinical utility of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART) in a rehabilitation setting.
METHOD:
Ninety-six patients were recruited from the caseload of four occupational therapists. Patients were assessed on admission. Clinical utility was based on time to complete assessments.
RESULTS:
Interrater reliability for the total score was very high (intraclass correlation coefficient = .91). Limits of agreement for the program indicated aggregate data from individual scores were within 1.3 units (range = -1.3 to 0.5) but individual scores would be within 10 units (range = -9.3 to 0.2). The PC-PART took 27 min to complete.
CONCLUSION:
The PC-PART may have sufficient interrater reliability and clinical utility to evaluate program outcomes. The limits of agreement for rating individuals were relatively large, suggesting that it may be difficult to use the PC-PART to make clinical inferences about an individual patient.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=33761 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêtPersonal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation / Susan W. Darzin in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 83(4) (Octobre 2016)
[article]
Titre : Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation Titre original : Utilité clinique du Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool pour la réadaptation en milieu hospitalier Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Susan W. Darzin ; Christine Imms ; Marilyn Di Stefano ; [et al...] Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 237-248 Langues : Français (fre) Mots-clés : activités de la vie quotidienne Classification internationale du fonctionnement du handicap et de la santé (CIF) évaluation des besoins évaluation des résultats (soins de santé) restriction de la participation (CIF) Résumé : Evidence supports validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), but clinical utility remains unverified.
Purpose.
This study aimed to investigate occupational therapists’ perceptions about the PC-PART’s clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation.
Method.
Using mixed methods, occupational therapists who had used the PC-PART as part of a research study in an inpatient rehabilitation setting completed a questionnaire (n = 9) and participated in a focus group (n = 6) to explore their perspectives about its clinical utility. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative data analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Findings.
Quantitative data highlighted both positive and negative aspects of the PC-PART’s clinical utility. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: nature of information gathered; familiarity with the instrument; perceived time and effort; item phrasing, interpretation, and presentation; and external influences on clinical use.
Implications.
The PC-PART was perceived to support gathering of clinically useful information, helpful to intervention and discharge planning. Recommendations for improving some item phrasing, operational definitions, and instructions were identified. Although standardized assessments were valued, use in routine practice was challenging, requiring a knowledge translation strategy.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47096
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 237-248[article] Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool: Clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation = Utilité clinique du Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool pour la réadaptation en milieu hospitalier [texte imprimé] / Susan W. Darzin ; Christine Imms ; Marilyn Di Stefano ; [et al...] . - 2016 . - p. 237-248.
Langues : Français (fre)
in Canadian Journal of Occupational Therapy > 83(4) (Octobre 2016) . - p. 237-248
Mots-clés : activités de la vie quotidienne Classification internationale du fonctionnement du handicap et de la santé (CIF) évaluation des besoins évaluation des résultats (soins de santé) restriction de la participation (CIF) Résumé : Evidence supports validity of the Personal Care Participation Assessment and Resource Tool (PC-PART), but clinical utility remains unverified.
Purpose.
This study aimed to investigate occupational therapists’ perceptions about the PC-PART’s clinical utility for inpatient rehabilitation.
Method.
Using mixed methods, occupational therapists who had used the PC-PART as part of a research study in an inpatient rehabilitation setting completed a questionnaire (n = 9) and participated in a focus group (n = 6) to explore their perspectives about its clinical utility. Quantitative data were summarized and qualitative data analyzed using inductive thematic analysis.
Findings.
Quantitative data highlighted both positive and negative aspects of the PC-PART’s clinical utility. Five themes emerged from the qualitative data: nature of information gathered; familiarity with the instrument; perceived time and effort; item phrasing, interpretation, and presentation; and external influences on clinical use.
Implications.
The PC-PART was perceived to support gathering of clinically useful information, helpful to intervention and discharge planning. Recommendations for improving some item phrasing, operational definitions, and instructions were identified. Although standardized assessments were valued, use in routine practice was challenging, requiring a knowledge translation strategy.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=47096 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Armoires à volets Document exclu du prêt - à consulter sur place
Exclu du prêt