[article] 
inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/4 (juillet-août 2011) . - p. 437-444

Titre :	Exploring expectations for upper-extremity motor treatment in people after stroke : a secondary analysis
Type de document :	texte imprimé
Auteurs :	Eliza M. PRAGER ; Rebecca L. BIRKENMEIER ; Catherine E. LANG
Année de publication :	2011
Article en page(s) :	p. 437-444
Langues :	Anglais (eng)
Mots-clés :	Accident cérébrovasculaire  Motricité  Traitement
Résumé :	OBJECTIVE. We explored expectations for outcomes during a research intervention for people with stroke. METHOD. Twelve people with chronic stroke participated in this secondary analysis from a pilot trial of a high-repetition, task-specific, upper-extremity intervention. First, we examined relationships between individual expectancy and session-by-session achievement of high numbers of repetitions. Second, we examined the relationship between expectancy for the intervention as a whole and improvements in upper-extremity motor function. We used Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients to evaluate the relationships. RESULTS. Correlations between individual expectancy and session-by-session achievement ranged from 0 to .84. Expectancy for improvement from the intervention was good (average = 7 of 10) but had a low correlation (.17) with actual improvement. CONCLUSION. Individual expectancy ratings were inconsistently related to session-by-session achievement. Expectancy for the invention as a whole was not related to improvement in upper-extremity motor function.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14102

[article] Exploring expectations for upper-extremity motor treatment in people after stroke : a secondary analysis [texte imprimé] / Eliza M. PRAGER ; Rebecca L. BIRKENMEIER ; Catherine E. LANG . - 2011 . - p. 437-444.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/4 (juillet-août 2011) . - p. 437-444

Mots-clés :	Accident cérébrovasculaire  Motricité  Traitement
Résumé :	OBJECTIVE. We explored expectations for outcomes during a research intervention for people with stroke. METHOD. Twelve people with chronic stroke participated in this secondary analysis from a pilot trial of a high-repetition, task-specific, upper-extremity intervention. First, we examined relationships between individual expectancy and session-by-session achievement of high numbers of repetitions. Second, we examined the relationship between expectancy for the intervention as a whole and improvements in upper-extremity motor function. We used Spearman rank-order correlation coefficients to evaluate the relationships. RESULTS. Correlations between individual expectancy and session-by-session achievement ranged from 0 to .84. Expectancy for improvement from the intervention was good (average = 7 of 10) but had a low correlation (.17) with actual improvement. CONCLUSION. Individual expectancy ratings were inconsistently related to session-by-session achievement. Expectancy for the invention as a whole was not related to improvement in upper-extremity motor function.
Permalink :	./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14102