Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h30-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera exceptionnellement fermé de 12h30 à 13h ce lundi 18 novembre.
Egalement, il sera fermé de 12h30 à 13h30 ce mercredi 20 novembre.
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Sara E. MCEWEN |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke / Helene J. Polatajko in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 66/1 (janvier-février 2012)
[article]
Titre : Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Helene J. Polatajko ; Sara E. MCEWEN ; et al. ; Jennifer D. RYAN Année de publication : 2012 Article en page(s) : p. 104-109 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Accident cérébrovasculaire Développement intellectuel Résumé : OBJECTIVE. The authors compared changes in client performance on three goals poststroke after the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO–OP) intervention or standard occupational therapy (SOT) to determine the magnitude and direction of change.
METHOD. Eight people living in the community following a stroke were randomly assigned to receive CO–OP (n = 4) or SOT (n = 4). CO–OP is a 10-session, cognitive-oriented approach to improving performance that uses client-driven cognitive strategies. SOT was therapist driven and combined task-specific and component-based training. Goal performance was measured by the therapist-rated Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS) and the participant-rated Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).
RESULTS. Using Mann-Whitney U test, we found that CO–OP participants showed significantly greater improvement in performance (PQRS, p = .02; COPM Performance, p = .02) compared with SOT but no improvement in satisfaction (COPM Satisfaction, p = .38).
CONCLUSION. The CO–OP group demonstrated larger performance improvements than the SOT group. Because of the promising results, an investigation using a larger sample is warranted.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14187
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 66/1 (janvier-février 2012) . - p. 104-109[article] Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke [texte imprimé] / Helene J. Polatajko ; Sara E. MCEWEN ; et al. ; Jennifer D. RYAN . - 2012 . - p. 104-109.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 66/1 (janvier-février 2012) . - p. 104-109
Mots-clés : Accident cérébrovasculaire Développement intellectuel Résumé : OBJECTIVE. The authors compared changes in client performance on three goals poststroke after the Cognitive Orientation to daily Occupational Performance (CO–OP) intervention or standard occupational therapy (SOT) to determine the magnitude and direction of change.
METHOD. Eight people living in the community following a stroke were randomly assigned to receive CO–OP (n = 4) or SOT (n = 4). CO–OP is a 10-session, cognitive-oriented approach to improving performance that uses client-driven cognitive strategies. SOT was therapist driven and combined task-specific and component-based training. Goal performance was measured by the therapist-rated Performance Quality Rating Scale (PQRS) and the participant-rated Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM).
RESULTS. Using Mann-Whitney U test, we found that CO–OP participants showed significantly greater improvement in performance (PQRS, p = .02; COPM Performance, p = .02) compared with SOT but no improvement in satisfaction (COPM Satisfaction, p = .38).
CONCLUSION. The CO–OP group demonstrated larger performance improvements than the SOT group. Because of the promising results, an investigation using a larger sample is warranted.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14187 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Réserve Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes
Exclu du prêt