Creating a clinically useful data collection form for the dash questionnaire / Leigh A. LEHMAN in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65/1 (janvier-février 2011)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/1 (janvier-février 2011) . - p. 45-54 Titre : Creating a clinically useful data collection form for the dash questionnaire Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Leigh A. LEHMAN ; Jessica JOHNSON ; et al. ; Bhagwant S. SINDHU Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p. 45-54 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Activités vie quotidienne  Evaluation  Handicap  Recueil données Résumé : PURPOSE. We generated a clinically useful data collection form for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. This data collection form is designed to aid in measuring change and goal setting. METHOD. Rasch analysis was used to generate three data collection forms for constructs on the DASH (gross motor, fine motor, and symptoms; N = 960). A form was completed to represent the findings from 1 study participant. Admission and discharge data were illustrated for one of the three sections (gross motor activity). Possible goals were indicated on the admission form. The discharge form illustrates whether these goals have been achieved. RESULTS. Figures illustrate the utility of the forms in observing functional change from admission to discharge and how the forms aid in goal setting. CONCLUSION. Use of the data collection form has many positive implications. This type of form could aid in goal setting and treatment planning. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14026 [article] Creating a clinically useful data collection form for the dash questionnaire [texte imprimé] / Leigh A. LEHMAN ; Jessica JOHNSON ; et al. ; Bhagwant S. SINDHU . - 2011 . - p. 45-54. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/1 (janvier-février 2011) . - p. 45-54 Mots-clés : Activités vie quotidienne  Evaluation  Handicap  Recueil données Résumé : PURPOSE. We generated a clinically useful data collection form for the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. This data collection form is designed to aid in measuring change and goal setting. METHOD. Rasch analysis was used to generate three data collection forms for constructs on the DASH (gross motor, fine motor, and symptoms; N = 960). A form was completed to represent the findings from 1 study participant. Admission and discharge data were illustrated for one of the three sections (gross motor activity). Possible goals were indicated on the admission form. The discharge form illustrates whether these goals have been achieved. RESULTS. Figures illustrate the utility of the forms in observing functional change from admission to discharge and how the forms aid in goal setting. CONCLUSION. Use of the data collection form has many positive implications. This type of form could aid in goal setting and treatment planning. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14026

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire / Leigh A. LEHMAN in American Journal of Occupational Therapy, Vol. 65/2 (mars-avril 2011)

Public ISBD [article]  inAmerican Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/2 (mars-avril 2011) . - p. 169-178 Titre : Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Leigh A. LEHMAN ; Michelle WOODBURY ; Craig A. VELOZO Année de publication : 2011 Article en page(s) : p. 169-178 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Evaluation  Handicap Résumé : OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch rating-scale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14099 [article] Examination of the factor structure of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire [texte imprimé] / Leigh A. LEHMAN ; Michelle WOODBURY ; Craig A. VELOZO . - 2011 . - p. 169-178. Langues : Anglais (eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 65/2 (mars-avril 2011) . - p. 169-178 Mots-clés : Evaluation  Handicap Résumé : OBJECTIVE. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) questionnaire is a global scale evaluating the impact of upper-extremity disorders. We sought to validate or challenge the unidimensional factor structure of the DASH. METHOD. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected from outpatient clinics. Factor analysis was performed in two steps, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) followed by confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). To provide further support for unidimensionality, fit statistics were calculated using the Andrich Rasch rating-scale model. RESULTS. EFA revealed three potential factors (eigenvalues = 18.40, 1.56, and 1.54). CFA was performed fitting a three-factor model. Tucker-Lewis Index (.99) and standardized root mean square residual (.05) values indicated good fit. Comparative fit index (.89) and root mean square error of approximation (.13) did not. When divided into three constructs, only one item misfit. CONCLUSION. More research is needed to determine situations in which division of the DASH may enhance interpretability. Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14099

Exemplaires (1)

Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
Revue	Revue	Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies	Réserve	Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt

---

1 (1 - 2 / 2)