Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-18h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h-16h30
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Alexander M. CRIZZLE
|
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche

[article]
Titre : |
Assessing the driving performance of a person with epilepsy presurgery and postsurgery |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Alexander M. CRIZZLE ; Sherrilene Classen ; et al. ; Christina LAFRANCA |
Année de publication : |
2013 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Conduite automobile Ergothérapie Epilepsie |
Résumé : |
Occupational therapists and certified driving rehabilitation specialists are uniquely skilled to assess functional abilities underlying driving performance. However, little information exists on the utility of clinical assessments to determine driving performance in people with epilepsy. This case study demonstrates how an occupational therapy evaluation battery was used to examine differences in visual and cognitive abilities and simulated driving performance before and after epilepsy surgery. Specifically, a 43-yr-old White man with right anterior lobe epilepsy underwent temporal lobectomy and had his driving-related abilities and simulated driving performance assessed pre- and postsurgery. The occupational therapy evaluation indicated improvements in executive skills, attention, and information processing speed postsurgery. Visuospatial abilities worsened after surgery, likely contributing to the modest increase in vehicle position errors on the driving simulator. Nevertheless, simulated driving performance improved after temporal lobectomy. Reductions in the number of visual scanning, lane maintenance, and speed regulation errors were recorded. |
Note de contenu : |
Oline Only |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14003 |
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/3 (mai-juin 2013)
[article] Assessing the driving performance of a person with epilepsy presurgery and postsurgery [texte imprimé] / Alexander M. CRIZZLE ; Sherrilene Classen ; et al. ; Christina LAFRANCA . - 2013. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/3 (mai-juin 2013)
Mots-clés : |
Conduite automobile Ergothérapie Epilepsie |
Résumé : |
Occupational therapists and certified driving rehabilitation specialists are uniquely skilled to assess functional abilities underlying driving performance. However, little information exists on the utility of clinical assessments to determine driving performance in people with epilepsy. This case study demonstrates how an occupational therapy evaluation battery was used to examine differences in visual and cognitive abilities and simulated driving performance before and after epilepsy surgery. Specifically, a 43-yr-old White man with right anterior lobe epilepsy underwent temporal lobectomy and had his driving-related abilities and simulated driving performance assessed pre- and postsurgery. The occupational therapy evaluation indicated improvements in executive skills, attention, and information processing speed postsurgery. Visuospatial abilities worsened after surgery, likely contributing to the modest increase in vehicle position errors on the driving simulator. Nevertheless, simulated driving performance improved after temporal lobectomy. Reductions in the number of visual scanning, lane maintenance, and speed regulation errors were recorded. |
Note de contenu : |
Oline Only |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14003 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Réserve | Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt |

[article]
Titre : |
Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Sherrilene Classen ; Alexander M. CRIZZLE ; Yanning WANG ; et al. |
Année de publication : |
2013 |
Article en page(s) : |
p.574-582 |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Mots-clés : |
Personne âgée Vieillissement Conduite automobile Test visuel Développement intellectuel |
Résumé : |
The Useful Field of View(®) (UFOV) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) are measures of divided attention. We determined which measure was more accurate in predicting on-road outcomes among drivers (N = 198, mean age = 73.86, standard deviation = 6.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the UFOV (Risk Index [RI] and Subtests 1-3) and Trails B significantly predicted on-road outcomes. Contrasting Trails B with the UFOV RI and subtests, the only difference was found between the UFOV RI and Trails B, indicating the UFOV RI was the best predictor of on-road outcomes. Misclassifications of drivers totaled 28 for the UFOV RI, 62 for Trails B, and 58 for UFOV Subtest 2. The UFOV RI is a superior test in predicting on-road outcomes, but the Trails B has acceptable accuracy and is comparable to the other UFOV subtests. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14191 |
in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/5 (septembre-octobre 2013) . - p.574-582
[article] Predicting older driver on-road performance by means of the useful field of view and trail making test part B [texte imprimé] / Sherrilene Classen ; Alexander M. CRIZZLE ; Yanning WANG ; et al. . - 2013 . - p.574-582. Langues : Anglais ( eng) in American Journal of Occupational Therapy > Vol. 67/5 (septembre-octobre 2013) . - p.574-582
Mots-clés : |
Personne âgée Vieillissement Conduite automobile Test visuel Développement intellectuel |
Résumé : |
The Useful Field of View(®) (UFOV) and Trail Making Test Part B (Trails B) are measures of divided attention. We determined which measure was more accurate in predicting on-road outcomes among drivers (N = 198, mean age = 73.86, standard deviation = 6.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves for the UFOV (Risk Index [RI] and Subtests 1-3) and Trails B significantly predicted on-road outcomes. Contrasting Trails B with the UFOV RI and subtests, the only difference was found between the UFOV RI and Trails B, indicating the UFOV RI was the best predictor of on-road outcomes. Misclassifications of drivers totaled 28 for the UFOV RI, 62 for Trails B, and 58 for UFOV Subtest 2. The UFOV RI is a superior test in predicting on-road outcomes, but the Trails B has acceptable accuracy and is comparable to the other UFOV subtests. |
Permalink : |
./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14191 |
|  |
Exemplaires (1)
|
Revue | Revue | Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies | Réserve | Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes Exclu du prêt |