Centre de Documentation Campus Montignies
Horaires :
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 28 octobre au 3 novembre
Lundi : 8h-18h30
Mardi : 8h-17h30
Mercredi 9h-16h30
Jeudi : 8h-18h30
Vendredi : 8h30-12h30 et 13h-14h30
Votre centre de documentation sera fermé du 28 octobre au 3 novembre
Bienvenue sur le catalogue du centre de documentation du campus de Montignies.
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur Linda Birt |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Faire une suggestion Affiner la recherche
A Narrative Literature Review of the Impact of Anti-TNFα Treatment on the Occupational Performance of People with Rheumatoid Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis / Margaret McArthur in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy, Volume 76 numéro 10 (01/10/2013)
[article]
Titre : A Narrative Literature Review of the Impact of Anti-TNFα Treatment on the Occupational Performance of People with Rheumatoid Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Margaret McArthur ; Linda Birt ; Lynne Goodacre Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : p. 456-469 Langues : Anglais (eng) Mots-clés : Rheumatic diseases disease management drug therapy Résumé : Introduction:
Anti-TNFα treatment has revolutionised the disease pathway for some people with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, although physiological improvements do not always readily translate into re-engagement in occupational activities. This review explores the evidence base for the impact of anti-TNFα on occupational performance.
Method:
Literature was searched from 2000–11. A four-stage process resulted in the review of 19 articles. The Weight of Evidence framework was used to assess quality and relevance to the review question.
Findings:
People on anti-TNFα treatment experience increased engagement in functional, psychological and social domains. Most studies focused on employment issues, with conflicting evidence about how well anti-TNFα protected against work disability and very limited evidence that anti-TNFα enabled return to paid work. The increase in productivity was to the detriment of other occupational domains, with resulting occupational imbalance.
Conclusion:
The assumption that clinical improvement is relatively trouble free is incorrect, as some people on anti-TNFα treatment continue to experience difficulties in all occupational domains, particularly work. People on anti-TNFα treatment do not routinely have access to occupational therapy services. Further research needs to explore the nuanced experiences of treatment and the role of occupational therapy in maximising the treatment potential of anti-TNFα.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=103235
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 76 numéro 10 (01/10/2013) . - p. 456-469[article] A Narrative Literature Review of the Impact of Anti-TNFα Treatment on the Occupational Performance of People with Rheumatoid Arthritis or Ankylosing Spondylitis [texte imprimé] / Margaret McArthur ; Linda Birt ; Lynne Goodacre . - 2013 . - p. 456-469.
Langues : Anglais (eng)
in The British Journal of Occupational Therapy > Volume 76 numéro 10 (01/10/2013) . - p. 456-469
Mots-clés : Rheumatic diseases disease management drug therapy Résumé : Introduction:
Anti-TNFα treatment has revolutionised the disease pathway for some people with rheumatoid arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis, although physiological improvements do not always readily translate into re-engagement in occupational activities. This review explores the evidence base for the impact of anti-TNFα on occupational performance.
Method:
Literature was searched from 2000–11. A four-stage process resulted in the review of 19 articles. The Weight of Evidence framework was used to assess quality and relevance to the review question.
Findings:
People on anti-TNFα treatment experience increased engagement in functional, psychological and social domains. Most studies focused on employment issues, with conflicting evidence about how well anti-TNFα protected against work disability and very limited evidence that anti-TNFα enabled return to paid work. The increase in productivity was to the detriment of other occupational domains, with resulting occupational imbalance.
Conclusion:
The assumption that clinical improvement is relatively trouble free is incorrect, as some people on anti-TNFα treatment continue to experience difficulties in all occupational domains, particularly work. People on anti-TNFα treatment do not routinely have access to occupational therapy services. Further research needs to explore the nuanced experiences of treatment and the role of occupational therapy in maximising the treatment potential of anti-TNFα.Permalink : ./index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=103235 Exemplaires (1)
Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité Revue Revue Centre de Documentation HELHa Campus Montignies Réserve Consultable sur demande auprès des documentalistes
Exclu du prêt