Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Horaires d'ouverture (en période scolaire)
Lundi, Mardi, Mercredi :
8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 17h
jeudi : matin sur RDV / 13h15 - 17h
vendredi : 8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 15h00
Bienvenue au Centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Le centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn LLN met à disposition de ses lecteurs un fonds documentaire spécialisé dans les domaines pouvant intéresser – de près ou de loin - les (futur·e·s) travailleur·euse·s sociaux·ales : travail social, sociologie, psychologie, droit, santé, économie, pédagogie, immigration, vieillissement, famille, précarité, délinquance, emploi, communication, etc.
: Comparing University Procedures in England
[article]
| Titre : |
Assessing Student Social Workers' Professional Suitability : Comparing University Procedures in England |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Caroline Currer, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2009 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 1481-1498 |
| Langues : |
Français (fre) |
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Formation professionnelle # Pratique professionnelle # Travail social
|
| Mots-clés : |
Angleterre |
| Résumé : |
"Universities providing social work education and training must ensure that those who qualify as social workers are ‘suitable’ or ‘fit for practice’—a gate-keeping role that has been discussed in a number of different national settings. In England, the introduction of registration for both qualified and student social workers has brought assessment of standards of professional conduct to the fore. For qualified workers, there is a single national ‘conduct procedure’ involving a public panel hearing. In relation to student social workers, procedures are particular to each university, albeit subject to scrutiny by the professional body, which has, to date, offered little guidance. This paper reports on a study comparing procedures in different universities. These were found to vary in relation to a number of factors, such as whether professional suitability is an academic or disciplinary matter; the name of the procedure and rationale; its focus and scope; the personnel involved and possible outcomes. The paper concludes that such variation is in the interests of neither students nor the profession, and that the professional body might helpfully offer more guidance to universities, as well as being specific about their own role in relation to aspects of registration." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14654 |
in The british journal of social work > 8, vol. 39 (December 2009) . - pp. 1481-1498
[article] Assessing Student Social Workers' Professional Suitability : Comparing University Procedures in England [texte imprimé] / Caroline Currer, Auteur . - 2009 . - pp. 1481-1498. Langues : Français ( fre) in The british journal of social work > 8, vol. 39 (December 2009) . - pp. 1481-1498
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Formation professionnelle # Pratique professionnelle # Travail social
|
| Mots-clés : |
Angleterre |
| Résumé : |
"Universities providing social work education and training must ensure that those who qualify as social workers are ‘suitable’ or ‘fit for practice’—a gate-keeping role that has been discussed in a number of different national settings. In England, the introduction of registration for both qualified and student social workers has brought assessment of standards of professional conduct to the fore. For qualified workers, there is a single national ‘conduct procedure’ involving a public panel hearing. In relation to student social workers, procedures are particular to each university, albeit subject to scrutiny by the professional body, which has, to date, offered little guidance. This paper reports on a study comparing procedures in different universities. These were found to vary in relation to a number of factors, such as whether professional suitability is an academic or disciplinary matter; the name of the procedure and rationale; its focus and scope; the personnel involved and possible outcomes. The paper concludes that such variation is in the interests of neither students nor the profession, and that the professional body might helpfully offer more guidance to universities, as well as being specific about their own role in relation to aspects of registration." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=14654 |
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER BJS 39/8 (2009) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |
