Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Horaires d'ouverture (en période scolaire)
Lundi, Mardi, Mercredi :
8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 17h
jeudi : matin sur RDV / 13h15 - 17h
vendredi : 8h30 - 12h30 / 13h15 - 15h00
Fermeture le 11 novembre 2024
Bienvenue au Centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn Louvain-la-Neuve
Le centre de documentation de la HELHa Cardijn LLN met à disposition de ses lecteurs un fonds documentaire spécialisé dans les domaines pouvant intéresser – de près ou de loin - les (futur·e·s) travailleur·euse·s sociaux·ales : travail social, sociologie, psychologie, droit, santé, économie, pédagogie, immigration, vieillissement, famille, précarité, délinquance, emploi, communication, etc.
: A Critical Reflection
[article]
| Titre : |
Assessment Frameworks : A Critical Reflection |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Beth R. Crisp, Auteur ; Mark R. Anderson, Auteur ; Joan Orme, Auteur |
| Editeur : |
Oxford : Oxford university press - GB - Oxford |
| Année de publication : |
2007 |
| Article en page(s) : |
pp. 1059-1077 |
| Langues : |
Anglo-saxon (ang) |
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Evaluation # Pratique professionnelle # Pratique sociale # Travail social
|
| Mots-clés : |
Evaluation Pratique sociale Pratique professionnelle Travail social |
| Résumé : |
"Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=12825 |
in The british journal of social work > 6, vol. 37 (sept. 2007) . - pp. 1059-1077
[article] Assessment Frameworks : A Critical Reflection [texte imprimé] / Beth R. Crisp, Auteur ; Mark R. Anderson, Auteur ; Joan Orme, Auteur . - Oxford : Oxford university press - GB - Oxford, 2007 . - pp. 1059-1077. Langues : Anglo-saxon ( ang) in The british journal of social work > 6, vol. 37 (sept. 2007) . - pp. 1059-1077
| Catégories : |
Cardijn
Evaluation # Pratique professionnelle # Pratique sociale # Travail social
|
| Mots-clés : |
Evaluation Pratique sociale Pratique professionnelle Travail social |
| Résumé : |
"Increasing widespread requirements that assessment practice conforms to generic guidelines contained in assessment frameworks has been contentious and critiques offered on individual frameworks have been assumed to apply to the concept of assessment frameworks more generally. After comparing four assessment frameworks currently being used in the UK, this paper argues that although some generalizations can be made, for the most part, they are highly individual documents in terms of range and depth of content, the extent to which they are evidenced and the quality of that evidence and implicit expectations as to the skill bases of assessors. Furthermore, the introduction of assessment frameworks is not in itself a panacea to ensure good practice. Even with the most comprehensive frameworks, social workers will still need comprehensive training in assessment and supervision of their practice." |
| Permalink : |
http://cdocs.helha.be/pmblln/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=12825 |
|
Exemplaires (1)
|
| PER BJS 37/6 (2007) | Périodique | Centre de documentation HELHa Cardijn LLN | Réserve Périodiques | Disponible |
